Sports betting has long evolved from the realm of entertainment into a well-established investment market with its own laws, strategies, and capital. Over the past 15 years, active bettors have formed a stable industry where millions of dollars are in circulation daily, and major bookmaking companies openly enter stock exchanges. However, despite the popularity of this field, there are still many distorted perceptions surrounding it. Myths about sports betting create false expectations for novice players, lead to losses, and hinder viewing betting as an analytical activity with clear patterns. Each distorted belief requires specific refutation. Only a complete understanding of the mechanics of betting allows for prudent financial management and the development of a profitable long-term strategy.
Sports betting brings easy money: a popular myth
The illusion of quick enrichment has accompanied the industry since its inception. Observers and newcomers often perceive betting as a simple game: place a bet — win. However, behind every successful bet lies systematic analysis, deep event research, and strict bankroll management discipline.

For stable profits, a bettor uses:
- mathematical models for calculating probabilities;
- team statistics for at least 30 matches;
- information on injuries, referees, weather, and player motivation;
- verification of the bookmaker’s line through an exchange (e.g., Pinnacle or Betfair).
The real Return on Investment (ROI) for successful bettors ranges from 3 to 7% in the long run. This means that with a bankroll of 100,000 rubles, a skilled player increases capital by 3,000–7,000 rubles per month. However, risks always accompany any transaction. Passive income without involvement and analysis does not exist.
The bookmaker always loses to the client
The common myth about sports betting is that every client’s win automatically becomes a loss for the company. In practice, the bookmaker earns from the margin — the embedded commission in the odds.
For example, if the event’s probability is 50%, a fair odds would be 2.00. The bookmaker sets it at 1.90. The 0.10 difference is their profit from each bet, regardless of the outcome. This provides the company with a stable income, even if some clients win.
Furthermore, top bookmakers (e.g., Bet365, 1xBet, Marathonbet) use advanced algorithms to limit successful players. They cut limits, delay payments, and block accounts — all of these are business mechanisms to protect the margin.
Intuition is enough in betting
Players often rely on “gut feeling,” based on personal preferences or past experiences, ignoring cold hard facts. Such an approach leads to systematic losses. For instance, in tennis, the favorite with odds of 1.25 loses in 28% of cases. If a player only bets on well-known athletes without analyzing form, surface, and player motivation, the bankroll will inevitably suffer losses.
An intuitive approach ignores value betting — the search for overvalued odds. This is the foundation of professional play. A player analyzes where the bookmaker’s assessment is lower than the actual probability and profits from this discrepancy. Intuition cannot identify value — only numbers and algorithms can.
Someone always knows the correct outcome
The myth of sports betting in the context of “fixed matches” or insider information is actively promoted by dubious “tipsters.” These “experts” sell paid predictions, promising 100% success. In practice, most of these “fixed match” claims are fabricated.
Global regulators (FIFA, ITIA, IBIA) monitor abnormal line movements daily and freeze suspicious events. In 2023, less than 0.17% of all matches worldwide were classified as “suspicious.” Even in these cases, no one guarantees the correct outcome — it’s merely a signal of unusual activity. Major bookmakers immediately suspend markets if they detect a sharp imbalance in bets. Therefore, the only sustainable strategy is working with open statistics rather than seeking “insider information.”
The bookmaker fairly assesses the odds
Many novice players believe that odds are an objective reflection of the event’s probability. However, the bookmaker distorts the line in their favor. This is called “odds bias” and is a result of two reasons: margin and player behavioral models.
For example, in a match between “Barcelona” and an underdog, the favorite’s odds may be understated because most players bet on them. The bookmaker reduces the odds to minimize losses and increase profits. At the same time, the underdog’s odds are often inflated — this is where the value lies.
A skilled player analyzes the line, compares quotes on multiple exchanges (e.g., Oddsportal, Betexplorer), and looks for errors in the bookmaker’s calculations. Blindly trusting the odds leads to overestimating risks and systematic losses.
Myth: Large sports bets lead to quick wins
An aggressive strategy where a player doubles the bet after a loss (martingale) may seem attractive in theory. In practice, it wipes out the bankroll after 3–5 consecutive losses. For example, starting with a 500 ruble bet, after 5 losses in a row, the amount reaches 16,000 rubles, with a total risk of 31,500 rubles.
Even with a sufficient bankroll, a high odds does not guarantee a win. The most common mistake is misjudging the probability and ignoring a losing streak. Skilled players use a fixed percentage of the bankroll (2–5%) and do not increase the amount after a loss. Only this approach maintains stability in the long run.
Steady income is possible without a strategy
Irregular bets, spontaneous event selection, lack of tracking and analysis turn betting into a casino. Without a strategy and record-keeping, a player loses control and cannot assess the effectiveness of their model.
Professional bettors do not believe in myths about sports betting but build their strategy on:

- ROI analysis (Return on Investment in %).
- Verification of forecasts through a retrospective model.
- Tracking all bets with market annotations (Asian handicaps, totals, etc.).
- Dispersion control (risk reduction through diversification).
- Building bankroll management (e.g., Kelly strategy or fixed %).
Only a systematic approach gives a chance to end up in the positive in the long term.
Conclusion
Myths about sports betting continue to influence players’ behavior even in an open market with accessible analytics. Misguided beliefs hinder viewing bets as an investment activity and push towards ill-considered decisions. Every successful player bases their actions on calculation, analysis, discipline, and a clear strategy. Without these, bets turn into a random process with guaranteed losses. Understanding key myths and refuting them is the first step towards sound capital management in betting.